Static Partglyph-style result
Review valve families, series, and candidate rows
Ball valve series view
Grouped by manufacturer and valve family
Requires Modification: 46
Requires Modification: 1
Requires Modification: 10
Requires Modification: 78
Requires Modification: 70, Probable Technical Match: 1
Requires Modification: 59, Probable Technical Match: 1
Requires Modification: 17, Probable Technical Match: 14
Requires Modification: 1
#1 NIBCO Inc. T-580-70 Requires modification 105
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T-580-70 is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 105.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#2 NIBCO Inc. T585-70-LL Requires modification 105
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T585-70-LL is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 105.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#3 NIBCO Inc. T585-70-LX Requires modification 105
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T585-70-LX is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 105.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#4 NIBCO Inc. T585-70-M Requires modification 105
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T585-70-M is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 105.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#5 NIBCO Inc. T585-70-NS Requires modification 105
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T585-70-NS is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 105.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#6 Crane Company (Crane CP&E) 92111/4" Requires modification 101
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
Crane Company (Crane CP&E) 92111/4" is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 101.0.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#7 NIBCO Inc. T-585-70 Requires modification 98.5
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T-585-70 is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 98.5.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.
#8 NIBCO Inc. T-595-Y-66-LF Requires modification 98.5
Technical comparison snapshot
Summary
NIBCO Inc. T-595-Y-66-LF is ranked against NIBCO NJ830X4 as a ball valve candidate with a visible score of 98.5.
The strongest signals are in Nominal size, Size token, Pressure rating, which gives the reviewer a fast technical starting point.
Fields such as End connection, Rating system, Class rating keep the result in review and make possible mismatch risk visible early.